[20231207]开发不应该这样写sql4.txt
–//最近在优化sql语句，发现另外一种风格，实际上以前也遇到过，感觉这就像一种病，会传染只要一个这样写后面的要么跟进要么
–//不改。我觉得开发应该感谢exadata，不然我们的生产系统估计会垮掉。
1.环境：
XXXXXX> @ver1
PORT_STRING VERSION BANNER
—————————— ————– ——————————————————————————–
x86_64/Linux 2.4.xx 11.2.0.4.0 Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.4.0 – 64bit Production
2.问题语句：
XXXXXX> @ sql_id ag76s7zum6z3b
–SQL_ID = ag76s7zum6z3b
SELECT MZ.BRID AS PATIENT_ID,
TO_CHAR(GH.SBXH) AS OUTPATIENT_ID,
:”SYS_B_0″ AS INHOSPITAL_ID, JZLS.JZXH AS VISIT_ID, MZ.MZHM AS CARD_NO,
GH.GHSJ AS VISIT_TIME, MZ.BRXM AS PATIENT_NAME, MZ.BRXB AS PATIENT_SEX,
MZ.CSNY AS PATIENT_BIRTHDATE, MZ.SFZH AS IDENTITY_CARD_ID,
:”SYS_B_1″ AS PATIENT_TYPE,
(SELECT GY_DMZD.DMMC FROM XXXXXX_YYY.GY_DMZD WHERE GY_DMZD.DMLB = :”SYS_B_2″ AND GY_DMZD.DMSB = MZ.MZDM) AS PATIENT_NATION,
(SELECT GY_SSXWH.NAME FROM XXXXXX_YYY.GY_SSXWH WHERE GY_SSXWH.SBXH = MZ.XZZ_SQS) AS FAMILY_ADDRESS_PROVINCE,
(SELECT GY_SSXWH.NAME FROM XXXXXX_YYY.GY_SSXWH WHERE GY_SSXWH.SBXH = MZ.XZZ_S) AS FAMILY_ADDRESS_CITY,
MZ.LXDZ AS FAMILY_ADDRESS_DETAIL, MZ.LXDH AS MOBILE_PHONE,
GY.KSDM AS DEPART_CODE, GY.KSMC AS DEPART_NAME,
KS.KSDM AS SUB_DEPART_CODE, KS.KSMC AS SUB_DEPART_NAME,
(SELECT CSZ FROM GY_XTCS WHERE CSMC = :”SYS_B_3″) AS HOS_ID
FROM XXXXXX_YYY.MS_BRDA MZ
LEFT JOIN XXXXXX_YYY.MS_GHMX GH
ON MZ.BRID = GH.BRID
LEFT JOIN XXXXXX_YYY.MS_GHKS KS
ON GH.KSDM = KS.KSDM
LEFT JOIN XXXXXX_YYY.GY_KSDM GY
ON KS.MZKS = GY.KSDM
LEFT JOIN XXXXXX_YYY.YS_MZ_JZLS JZLS
ON JZLS.GHXH = GH.SBXH
WHERE ((:card_no = :”SYS_B_4″ OR :card_no IS NULL) OR MZ.MZHM = :card_no)
AND ((:patient_id = :”SYS_B_5″ OR :patient_id IS NULL) OR MZ.BRID = :patient_id)
AND ((:patientName = :”SYS_B_6″ OR :patientName IS NULL) OR MZ.BRXM = :patientName)
AND ((:patientSex = :”SYS_B_7″ OR :patientSex IS NULL) OR MZ.BRXB = :patientSex)
AND ((:deptName = :”SYS_B_8″ OR :deptName IS NULL) OR GY.KSMC = :deptName);
–//我做了格式化处理，原始程序代码就一行。
–//可以看出开发的本意，就是带入任意参数都可以查询。可惜oracle 优化器没有这么智能，无法选择合理的执行路径。
–//根据输入选择合适的索引,导致选择全部扫描。
SYS@192.168.100.141:1621/dbcn/dbcn1> @ seg2 %.MS_BRDA
SEG_MB OWNER SEGMENT_NAME SEGMENT_TYPE SEG_TABLESPACE_NAME BLOCKS HDRFIL HDRBLK
———- ——————– —————————— ——————– —————————— ———- ———- ———-
1656 XXXXXX_YYY MS_BRDA TABLE XXXXXX_YYY 211968 52 852001
–//1.6G.
–//执行计划如下:
Plan hash value: 1015797529
———————————————————————————————————————————-
| Id | Operation | Name | E-Rows |E-Bytes| Cost (%CPU)| E-Time | OMem | 1Mem | Used-Mem |
———————————————————————————————————————————-
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | 60543 (100)| | | | |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | GY_DMZD | 1 | 20 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | |
|* 2 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_GY_DMZD | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1025K| 1025K| |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | GY_SSXWH | 1 | 13 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | |
|* 4 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_GY_SSXWH | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1025K| 1025K| |
| 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | GY_SSXWH | 1 | 13 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | |
|* 6 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_GY_SSXWH | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1025K| 1025K| |
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | GY_XTCS | 1 | 18 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | |
|* 8 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_GY_XTCS | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1025K| 1025K| |
| 9 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 805 | 123K| 60543 (1)| 00:12:07 | | | |
|* 10 | FILTER | | | | | | | | |
|* 11 | HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER | | 687 | 99615 | 58034 (1)| 00:11:37 | 2782K| 2782K| 1588K (0)|
| 12 | TABLE ACCESS STORAGE FULL | GY_KSDM | 1099 | 24178 | 7 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1025K| 1025K| |
|* 13 | HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER | | 687 | 84501 | 58027 (1)| 00:11:37 | 2596K| 2596K| 1573K (0)|
| 14 | TABLE ACCESS STORAGE FULL | MS_GHKS | 429 | 11583 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1025K| 1025K| |
| 15 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 687 | 65952 | 58022 (1)| 00:11:37 | | | |
|* 16 | TABLE ACCESS STORAGE FULL | MS_BRDA | 92 | 6532 | 57498 (1)| 00:11:30 | 1025K| 1025K| |
| 17 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MS_GHMX | 8 | 200 | 10 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | |
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_MS_GHMX_BRID | 8 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1025K| 1025K| |
| 19 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | YS_MZ_JZLS | 1 | 12 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I_YS_MZ_JZLS_GHXH | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | 1025K| 1025K| |
———————————————————————————————————————————-
SYS@192.168.100.141:1621/dbcn/dbcn1> @ bind_cap ag76s7zum6z3b :card_no
SQL_ID CHILD_NUMBER WAS NAME POSITION MAX_LENGTH LAST_CAPTURED DATATYPE_STRING VALUE_STRING
————- ———— — ——— ——– ———- ——————- ————— ————
ag76s7zum6z3b 0 YES :CARD_NO 5 32 2023-12-06 09:54:09 VARCHAR2(32) 90377195
1 YES :CARD_NO 5 32 2023-12-05 11:29:35 VARCHAR2(32) 02666713
2 YES :CARD_NO 5 32 2023-12-06 19:33:57 VARCHAR2(32) 91544379
SYS@192.168.100.141:1621/dbcn/dbcn1> @ bind_cap_awr ag76s7zum6z3b ”
no rows selected
–//这样语句在awr历史表还没有记录。可以发现在共享池抓到的sql语句都是带入card_no参数的。
–//我多次提过不要这样写sql语句，这不是在学校写家庭作业,这是生产系统!!这类语句在生产系统还有一大堆，真不知道现在的毕业生
–//如何毕业的。